Congress Leader Calls Rahul Gandhi “Second Ambedkar” BJP Fires Back

“Could Be Second Ambedkar”, Udit Raj’s Remark on Rahul Gandhi

At a recent gathering centered on OBC issues and the push for a national caste census, Congress leader Udit Raj declared that if OBC communities truly understood Rahul Gandhi’s commitment, he could emerge as the “second Ambedkar” for them. Raj framed Gandhi’s advocacy on caste survey and social justice reforms as transformative—offering a platform for reduced inequality and greater economic empowerment for marginalized groups.

BJP’s Strong Counterattack

The BJP wasted no time in criticizing the statement. Spokesperson Shehzad Poonawalla accused Congress of disrespecting Dr. B.R. Ambedkar by seeking a replacement, arguing that Raj’s remark undermines the dignity and legacy of India’s Constitution-maker. Other BJP leaders, including Gaurav Bhatia, charged that the Congress has a long history of insulting OBC communities and glorifying corrupt leaders, calling the comparison both hollow and politically motivated.

Wider Political Implications

The incident highlights the escalating political contest around social justice narratives:

Critics have called the remark a cynical move, designed to curry favor with OBC voters rather than reflect genuine ideological alignment with Ambedkar’s legacy.
Congress proponents maintain their focus on caste-based reforms—such as lifting the 50% reservation cap and conducting a caste census—aligning with Udit Raj’s vision.

Rahul Gandhi himself has publicly acknowledged failing to conduct a caste census during the previous UPA era, calling it a major oversight he aims to correct. Meanwhile, Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge continues to press for these reforms, citing them as integral to meaningful social equity.

The Political Takeaway

This exchange from Udit Raj has intensified the debate over leadership, social justice, and symbolic representation:

Congress: Presents Rahul Gandhi as a champion of caste reform and OBC upliftment.
BJP: Frames the comparison as disingenuous and offensive, citing Congress’s inconsistent record on caste politics.
Public discourse: Now wrestling with questions of legacy—who truly embodies Ambedkar’s ideals, and how political narratives shape identity politics.

Would you like an expanded analysis of Congress’s caste policy agenda or reaction from civil society leaders?